Amazon – actions speak louder than words

The free speech debate was reignited this week by Amazon deciding to sell The Pedophile’s Guide to Love and Pleasure: a Child-lover’s Code of Conduct. I decided not to check this out on their website, I wasn’t prepared to give them the hits and up their advertising numbers, but I did read quite a few articles on the topic.

 The first I heard was via twitter (I can’t remember who tweeted it) and I tracked down this article on the msnbc.comwebsite which includes the authors attempt to reason with why this book should be made available for “pedosexuals”.  Again I’m not quoting a person like this on my blog but the article by Helen A.S. Popkin can be found here. What I did find in her article, which I will quote, is Amazon’s reply to the outrage in selling this book. She writes:

Amazon issued a statement that will no doubt fuel the outraged comments multiplying on the “Pedophile’s Guide” Amazon page.”Amazon believes it is censorship not to sell certain books simply because we or others believe their message is objectionable,” it reads. “Amazon does not support or promote hatred or criminal acts, however, we do support the right of every individual to make their own purchasing decisions.”

This inevitably lead the free speech debate, the old proverbial “slippery slope”, and those who just said, fuck it, the truth of the matter is not everyone deserves free speech. The gamut of comments via the twitter hashtag #boycottamazon is a fair indication of both sides of the story.

Furthermore, as I have been researching this piece I’ve discovered another article on with claims that “Amazon sells books and videos containing images of children in possible sexual situations.”

Besides the obvious fact that paedophilia is illegal, I just can’t get over the sheer arrogance on behalf of Amazon. It tells us of their “they need us more than we need them” attitude and their blatant disregard for their consumers. Amazon is a multi-million dollar company. The profits they would make from this book are slim, a drop in the ocean. At what point did Amazon feel that they didn’t need to worry about the affect of their products on their consumers because they were just too big to care. In my eyes it boils down to this:

1 – Companies should have a moral compass, a code of conduct, a moment of thought before they add a new product to their line.

2 – When they add that new product they must consider the ramifications wider than their ability to make money.

This is a damaging and dangerous product that Amazon are selling.

I don’t buy from Amazon. I live in Australia and consider my carbon miles and the impact on the Australian book trade when I buy goods, so buying  from a multi million dollar US company doesn’t really do it for me. But judging from the public response Amazon’s decision has damaged the company name and potential sales in the pre-christmas period. Any director questioning whether it was a good decision to sell whatever they want without considering their audience needs to think again.

Paedophilia is more than just illegal. Amazon know this but chose to ignore this despite their code that “Amazon does not support or promote hatred or criminal acts”. One more time in case it doesn’t sink in “Amazon does not support or promote hatred or criminal acts”.  But actions really do speak louder than words, and this works both ways. Let’s act – boycott Amazon.

One Comment

  1. Hello from the UK Boycott Amazon team!

    I have really pushed the campaign in the UK, and the way I see it is this. Its not just about this book. There are lots of books and video which are advocating illegal activity, as well as some other pretty offensive to all stuff. Amazon have left themselves wide open to “attack” as they have very loose rules for what they will and wont sell (and profit from, lets not forget that). They need to actually list what they will not host on their site, as at present they say its stuff they find offensive. If that was the case, this book, which in their only statement they agreed was offensive to them too, should never have been posted- they broke their own rule.
    The problem is, whether they say they feel they have to host material of this nature or any offensive nature, by hosting it whether they mean to or not it says “yeah, we support it, its not offensive”. Especially as they earn revenue from it.
    Another major issue is their reluctance to be accountable. One statement was released before the book was quietly pulled, then thats it. I was asked to take part in a BBC radio broadcast, and the BBC asked them to comment or take part. They didn’t even acknowledge them.
    So, Amazon are happy to have you as customers, they will email you special offers and deals. Yet if you question their reasons behind their behaviour, they ignore you. Nice way to treat you after lining their pockets!



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s